Pollution, health, and the planet: time for decisive action
Pamela Das
Richard Horton
Published:October 19, 2017
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32588-6
For decades, pollution and its harmful effects on people's health, the environment, and the planet have been neglected both by governments and the international development community. Pollution is the largest environmental cause of disease and death in the world today, responsible for an estimated 9 million premature deaths in 2015.
1 92% of all pollution-related mortality is seen in low-income and middle-income countries.
1 A new LancetCommission on pollution and health aims to confront and overturn this urgent predicament.
1The substantial health and economic costs of pollution globally can no longer be ignored.
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health is the product of a collaboration between The Lancet, the Global Alliance on Health and Pollution (GAHP), including independent researchers and policy makers, and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA. The report was led by Philip Landrigan, an environmental scientist and physician, and Richard Fuller, Founder and President of the non-governmental organisation Pure Earth and the secretariat of GAHP. The Commission's report focuses much-needed attention on the problem of pollution, especially industrial, vehicular, and chemical pollution, and provides actionable and cost-effective solutions to policy makers, while dispelling the myth that pollution is an inevitable consequence of economic development. The Commission identifies knowledge gaps and sets out a research agenda for future work.
• View related content for this article
As the report shows, no country is unaffected by pollution. Human activities, including industrialisation, urbanisation, and globalisation, are all drivers of pollution. Through analyses of existing and emerging data, the report examines the health effects and economic costs of multiple forms of pollution for the first time, including air (ambient and household), water, soil, and workplace. Additionally, the report presents troubling new data on the extent of chemical and pesticide pollution, including pollution by toxic chemicals at contaminated sites. The nature of pollution is changing, and is worsening in places. Many effects of chemical pollutants are yet to be determined but much is still known. The Commission estimates welfare losses due to pollution to be more than US$4·6 trillion per year, which is equivalent to 6·2% of global economic output.
1
The linkages between pollution, climate, and planetary health (the health of human civilisations and the natural systems on which they depend) are made throughout the Commission report. Pollution is a major theme within planetary health because the drivers of climate change, such as the combustion of fossil fuels or land use change, are also important contributors to pollution. Pollution itself has effects, which are still incompletely understood, on a range of natural systems—for example, toxic chemicals can cause reduced ecosystem function that can indirectly affect human health.
2
In 2006, the Stern review commissioned by the UK Government was influential in reframing climate change as an economic issue, and not merely an environmental challenge.
3 The Stern review improved our understanding of the economic costs of climate change, and inspired a huge amount of subsequent work. We hope that the findings and recommendations from this Lancet Commission will also marshal action in the health and development sectors, and persuade leaders at the national, state, provincial, and city levels to make pollution a priority. Although there is some activity on pollution internationally, much more is needed. The LancetCommission is launched in New York, USA, at a worrisome time, when the US Government's Environmental Protection Agency, headed by Scott Pruitt, is undermining established environmental regulations. This year's annual UN Environment Assembly will convene in Nairobi, Kenya, on Dec 4–6, 2017. Ministers of Environment from member states, alongside civil society and the private sector, will be in attendance. For the first time, the overarching conference theme is “Towards a Pollution-Free Planet”. Recommendations from this LancetCommission are under consideration, and it is hoped that the outcomes will prioritise pollution from a health perspective.
View Large Image
Copyright © 2018 Ami Vitale/Panos
This Lancet Commission should inform policy makers and serve as a timely call to action. Pollution is a winnable battle. In the latest results of the Global Burden of Disease, for example, the age-standardised death rates for all causes of air pollution were reported to have fallen by 23% between 2006 and 2016.
4 Now is the moment to accelerate our collective response. Current and future generations deserve a pollution-free world.
---
We declare no competing interests. We would like to thank Philip Landrigan and Richard Fuller for their leadership of the Lancet Commission on pollution and health, and the Commissioners, independent researchers, and policy makers for their contributions to this report. We would like to thank USAID, US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the European Commission, and the Governments of Germany, Norway, and Sweden for their funding of the report, input, or both.
References
Landrigan PJ
Fuller R
Acosta NJR
et al.
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.Lancet. 2017; (published online Oct 19.)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0
View in Article
Scopus (125)
PubMed
Summary
Full Text
Full Text PDF
Google Scholar
Whitmee S
Haines A
Beyrer C
et al.
Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health.Lancet. 2015; 386: 1973-2028
View in Article
Scopus (235)
PubMed
Summary
Full Text
Full Text PDF
Google Scholar
Stern N
Stern review report on the economics of climate change.
http://www.wwf.se/source.php/1169157/Stern%20Report_Exec%20Summary.pdf
Date: 2006(accessed Sept 29, 2017).
View in Article
Google Scholar
GBD 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.Lancet. 2017; 390: 1345-1422
View in Article
Scopus (189)
PubMed
Summary
Full Text
Full Text PDF
Google Scholar
Article Info
Publication History
Published: October 19, 2017
Identification
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32588-6
No comments:
Post a Comment